Look, you don't even need doomstacks once you have a good shadow mage, and a couple of tanky units for sieges and cleanup. Plus ironbreakers do quality as ranged as well ^^ kinda That's the obvious flaw with any single one of your threads, it always boils down to your flawed preference of using doomstacks.Īnd besides you totally can play a full missile (except Lord/hero) army with dwarfes, a thunderer frontline is worth it's name and your Lords/heroes are perfect tarpits anyway. You realise not anyone uses doomstacks, right? In fact, they don't get cav at all.īecause they suck. Like pit of shades, burning head, flamestorm, Hawkriders, etc. The counter to massive Waugh armies is magic. You can't even spam 18 Artillery armies like Bretonnia 'cuz as Dwarves you have supply lines and your econ is a lot worse. Most Dwarven campaigns end on T30, when Grimgor comes with 5 Waugh armies and wipes out the poor unfortunate masochist who was stupid enough to play the Dwarves. And if we're talking about doomstacks, Dragon or Construct or Dino doomstacks are better. People talk about their units, but they don't come online until T80.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |